FEATURES
Suzuki’s DF200 features cutting edge technology for stand out performance and fuel efficiency.
Start system |
Electric start |
Multi-point sequential electronic fuel injection |
Standard |
Two-stage gear reduction system |
Standard |
Offset driveshaft |
Standard |
Over-rev. limiter |
Standard |
Low oil pressure caution |
Standard |
Speedometer pickup on gear case |
Standard |
Suzuki anti-corrosion system |
Standard |
SPECS
Shaft length |
L: 508mm (20") | X: 635mm (25") |
Starting system |
Electric |
Weight |
L: 257kg | X: 263kg |
Engine type |
DOHC 24–valve |
Fuel delivery system |
Multi-point sequential electronic fuel injection |
No. of cylinders |
V6 (55-degree) |
Displacement |
3,614cm3 |
Bore x Stroke |
95mm x 85mm |
Maximum output |
147.0kW |
Full throttle operating range |
5,000–6,000rpm |
Steering |
Remote |
Oil pan capacity |
8.0 litres |
Ignition system |
Fully-transistorised |
Alternator |
12V 54A |
Engine mounting |
Shear mount |
Trim method |
Power trim & tilt |
Gear ratio |
2.29:1 |
Gear shift |
F-N-R |
Exhaust |
Through prop hub exhaust |
Propeller selection (pitch) |
17"–27.5" (s/s) |
Fuel |
minimum 91 (RON) octane |
Warranty |
5 years for recreational use |
PERFORMANCE TESTS
DF200 tested on Carolina Skiff 23ft
Test Conditions
Date: |
18/02/2011 |
Location: |
Gold Coast |
Conditions: |
Light chop, mild wind |
Temperature: |
n/a |
Crew: |
2 |
Test Boat: Carolina Skiff 23ft
Length: |
7.0m |
Beam: |
2.5m |
Dry Weight: |
1500kg |
Max Horsepower: |
200hp |
Fuel Capacity: |
320L |
Weight as tested: |
1750kg (est) |
Conclusion
Optimal Cruise Speed: |
44.9km/h |
Cruise Range (Approx) Based on 95% Fuel Capacity: |
475km |
Maximum Speed: |
79.2km/h |
0-40km/h: |
n/a |
Outboard: Suzuki DF200
Horsepower: | 200hp |
Cylinder: | V6 |
Weight: | 263kg |
Gear Ratio: | 2.29:1 |
Propeller: | Suzuki 16 X 21.5 3 blade stainless steel |
Suzuki Performance Figures
Suzuki Fuel Consumption Comparison
DF200 tested on Seafarer Vagabond 6.2m
Test Conditions
Date: |
1/10/2012 |
Location: |
Raby Bay, QLD |
Conditions: |
0.5 - 1.0m chop - light winds |
Temperature: |
28.5°C |
Crew: |
2 |
Test Boat: Seafarer Vagabond 6.2m
Length: |
6.2m |
Beam: |
2.4m |
Dry Weight: |
1200kg |
Max Horsepower: |
250hp |
Fuel Capacity: |
220L |
Weight as tested: |
1450kg (est) |
Conclusion
Optimal Cruise Speed: |
46.2km/h |
Cruise Range (Approx) Based on 95% Fuel Capacity: |
299km |
Maximum Speed: |
73km/h |
0-40km/h: |
n/a |
Outboard: Suzuki DF200
Horsepower: | 200hp |
Cylinder: | V6 |
Weight: | 263kg |
Gear Ratio: | 2.29:1 |
Propeller: | Suzuki 16 x 18.5 3 blade stainless steel |
Suzuki Performance Figures
Suzuki Fuel Consumption Comparison
DF200 tested on Sealegs Ampibious 7.7m Centre Console
Test Conditions
Date: |
4/10/2013 |
Location: |
Browns Bay, NZ |
Conditions: |
5 to 10kn breeze - calm |
Temperature: |
18°C |
Crew: |
3 |
Test Boat: Sealegs Ampibious 7.7m Centre Console
Length: |
7.7m |
Beam: |
2.61m |
Dry Weight: |
1600kg |
Max Horsepower: |
200hp |
Fuel Capacity: |
180L |
Weight as tested: |
1950kg (est) |
Conclusion
Optimal Cruise Speed: |
39km/h (20.9 knots) |
Cruise Range (Approx) Based on 95% Fuel Capacity: |
311km |
Maximum Speed: |
74km/h |
0-40km/h: |
n/a |
Outboard: Suzuki DF200
Horsepower: | 200hp |
Cylinder: | V6 |
Weight: | 263kg |
Gear Ratio: | 2.29:1 |
Propeller: | Suzuki 16 x 18.5 3 blade stainless steel |
Suzuki Performance Figures
Suzuki Fuel Consumption Comparison
DF200 tested on Extreme 700 Game King
Test Conditions
Date: |
19/01/2017 |
Location: |
Tauranga NZ |
Conditions: |
25kn |
Temperature: |
20°C |
Crew: |
2 |
Test Boat: Extreme 700 Game King
Length: |
7.0m |
Beam: |
n/a |
Dry Weight: |
1500kg |
Max Horsepower: |
n/a |
Fuel Capacity: |
200L |
Weight as tested: |
n/a |
Conclusion
Optimal Cruise Speed: |
51km/h |
Cruise Range (Approx) Based on 95% Fuel Capacity: |
225km |
Maximum Speed: |
67.5k/m |
0-40km/h: |
n/a |
Outboard: Suzuki DF200TX
Horsepower: | 200hp |
Cylinder: | 6 |
Weight: | 263kg |
Gear Ratio: | 2.29:1 |
Propeller: | Suzuki 16" x 18.5" 3 blade stainless steel |
Suzuki Performance Figures
Suzuki Fuel Consumption Comparison